Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Short-term (< 8 wk) high-intensity interval training in diseased cohorts
Blackwell JEM, Doleman B, Herrod PJJ, Ricketts S, Phillips BE, Lund JN, Williams JP
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2018 Sep;50(9):1740-1749
systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Exercise training regimes can lead to improvements in measures of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), improved general health, and reduced morbidity and overall mortality risk. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) offers a time-efficient approach to improve CRF in healthy individuals, but the relative benefits of HIIT compared with traditional training methods are unknown in across different disease cohorts. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares CRF gains in randomized controlled trials of short-term (< 8 wk) HIIT versus either no exercise control (CON) or moderate continuous training (MCT) within diseased cohorts. Literature searches of the following databases were performed: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and PubMed (all from inception to December 1, 2017), with further searches of ClinicalTrials.gov and citations via Google Scholar. Primary outcomes were effect on CRF variables: VO2peak and anaerobic threshold. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. HIIT resulted in a clinically significant increase in VO2peak compared with CON (mean difference (MD) 3.32 mL/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.56 to 2.08). Overall HIIT provided added benefit to VO2peak over MCT (MD 0.79 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.39). The benefit of HIIT was most marked in patients with cardiovascular disease when compared with MCT (VO2peak: MD 1.66 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.73; anaerobic threshold: MD 1.61 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.90). CONCLUSIONS: HIIT elicits improvements in objective measures of CRF within 8 wk in diseased cohorts compared with no intervention. When compared with MCT, HIIT imparts statistically significant additional improvements in measures of CRF, with clinically important additional improvements in VO2peak in cardiovascular patients. Comparative efficacy of HIIT versus MCT combined with an often reduced time commitment may warrant HIIT's promotion as a viable clinical exercise intervention.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help