Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Gunay Ucurum S, Kaya DO, Kayali Y, Askin A, Tekindal MA
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 2018 Jul;52(4):249-255
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy on pain, function and quality of life in shoulder impingement syndrome. METHODS: Eighty-three patients (66 females, 17 males; mean age 48.2 +/- 7.33 years) with shoulder impingement syndrome were selected and 79 of them were randomly allocated into four groups. Group 1 (n = 19, mean age 47.89 +/- 7.12 years) was given hot pack and exercises, group 2 (n = 20, mean age 47.70 +/- 6.51 years) was given hot packs, exercises and interferential current, group 3 (n = 20, mean age 48.50 +/- 8.34 years) was given hot packs, exercises and TENS and group 4 (n = 20, mean age 48.55 +/- 7.89 years) was given hot packs, exercises and ultrasound three times a week for four weeks. Assessments were made before treatment, right after it and three months after that using the visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measures. RESULTS: At the fourth week and third month assessments, all groups showed significant improvements in terms of pain, DASH and SF-36 physical component scores (p < 0.05). In intragroup comparisons, a significant difference between pre- and post-treatment results was found only in SF-36 mental component scores of group 2. No significant difference was observed between the groups in any stage of the study period (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of ultrasound, interferential current and TENS in addition to exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome treatment had similar improvements in terms of pain, function and physical component of quality of life. However, interferential current treatment showed significantly better outcomes for the mental component of quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help