Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Commercially available compression garments or electrical stimulation do not enhance recovery following a sprint competition in elite cross-country skiers [with consumer summary]
Govus AD, Andersson EP, Shannon OM, Provis H, Karlsson M, McGawley K
European Journal of Sport Science 2018;18(10):1299-1308
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

This study investigated whether commercially available compression garments (COMP) exerting a moderate level of pressure and/or neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) accelerate recovery following a cross-country sprint skiing competition compared with a control group (CON) consisting of active recovery only. Twenty-one senior (12 males, 9 females) and 11 junior (6 males, 5 females) Swedish national team skiers performed an outdoor sprint skiing competition involving four sprints lasting approximately 3 to 4 min. Before the competition, skiers were matched by sex and skiing level (senior versus junior) and randomly assigned to COMP (n = 11), NMES (n = 11) or CON (n = 10). Creatine kinase (CK), urea, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, and perceived muscle pain were measured before and 8, 20, 44 and 68 h after competition. Neither COMP nor NMES promoted the recovery of blood biomarkers, CMJ or perceived pain post-competition compared with CON (all p > 0.05). When grouping all 32 participants, urea and perceived muscle pain increased from baseline, peaking at 8 h (standardised mean difference (SMD) (95% confidence intervals (CIs))) 2.8 (2.3 to 3.2)) and 44 h (odds ratio (95% CI) 3.3 (2.1 to 5.1)) post-competition, respectively. Additionally, CMJ was lower than baseline 44 and 68 h post-competition in both males and females (p < 0.05). CK increased from baseline in males, peaking at 44 h (SMD 1.4 (-0.4 to 0.9)), but was decreased in females at 20 h post-competition (SMD -0.8 (-1.4 to -0.2)). In conclusion, cross-country sprint skiing induced symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage peaking 8 to 44 h post-competition. However, neither COMP nor NMES promoted physiological or perceptual recovery compared with CON.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help