Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Social participation modifies the effect of a structured physical activity program on major mobility disability among older adults: results from the LIFE study
Corbett DB, Rejeski WJ, Tudor-Locke C, Glynn NW, Kritchevsky SB, McDermott MM, Church TS, Fielding RA, Gill TM, King AC, Miller M, Chen H, Pahor M, Manin TM, for the LIFE Study Investigators
The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2018 Nov;73(8):1501-1513
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether baseline social participation modifies the effect of a long-term structured physical activity (PA) program on major mobility disability (MMD). METHODS: 1,635 sedentary adults (70 to 89 years) with physical limitations were randomized to either a structured PA or health education (HE) intervention. Social participation was defined categorically at baseline. High social participation was defined as attending organized group functions at least once per week and visiting with noncohabitating friends and family >= 7 hr per week. Anything less was considered limited social participation. Participants performed a standardized walking test at baseline and every 6 months for up to 42 months. MMD was defined as the loss in the ability to walk 400 m. RESULTS: There was a significant intervention by social participation interaction (p = 0.003). Among individuals with high levels of social participation, those randomized to PA had significantly lower incidence of MMD (hazard ratio (HR) 0.43 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.68); p < 0.01) than those randomized to HE. Individuals with limited social participation showed no mobility benefit of the PA intervention when compared with their HE counterparts (HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.11); p = 0.40). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that baseline social participation is an important factor for the success of a PA intervention aimed at delaying mobility disability.
Copyright the Gerontological Society of America. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help