Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy for greater trochanteric pain syndrome with gluteal tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Carlisi E, Cecini M, Di N, G, Manzoni F, Tinelli C, Lisi C |
| Clinical Rehabilitation 2019 Apr;33(4):670-680 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (f-ESWT) is an effective treatment in a population affected by greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial, with blind outcome assessors. SETTING: Outpatients, University Hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 50 patients affected by GTPS with gluteal tendinopathy. INTERVENTIONS: The study group was assigned to receive f-ESWT, the control group received ultrasound therapy (UST). MAIN MEASURES: We assessed hip pain and lower limb function by means of a numeric rating scale (p-NRS) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS scale), respectively. The first follow-up evaluation (2M-FUP) was performed two months after the first treatment session, the second (6M-FUP) was carried out six months later. RESULTS: The mean age of the population was 61.24 (9.26) years. A marked prevalence of the female sex was recorded (44 subjects, 86%). The statistical analysis showed a significant pain reduction over time for the study group and the control group, the f-ESWT proving to be significantly more effective than UST (p < 0.05) at the 2M-FUP (2.08 versus 3.36) and at the 6M-FUP (0.79 versus 2.03). A marked improvement of the LEFS total score was observed in both groups as well, but we found no statistical differences in the comparisons between groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that f-ESWT is effective in reducing pain, both in the short-term and in the mid-term perspective. We also observed a functional improvement in the affected lower limb, but, in this case, f-ESWT showed not to be superior to UST.
|