Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of smartphone application-supported self-rehabilitation for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized control study [with consumer summary]
Choi Y, Nam J, Yang D, Jung W, Lee HR, Kim SH
Clinical Rehabilitation 2019 Apr;33(4):653-660
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of smartphone-assisted self-rehabilitation in patients with frozen shoulder. DESIGN: A single-center, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Orthopedic department of a university hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 84 patients with frozen shoulder were recruited. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly divided into two groups: a smartphone-assisted exercise group (n = 42) and a conventional self-exercise group (n = 42). The study was performed over three months, during which each group performed home-based rehabilitation. MAIN MEASURES: Visual analogue scale for pain and passive shoulder range of motion were assessed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Technology Acceptance Model-2 and Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use scores were evaluated in the smartphone group. RESULTS: Initial visual analogue scale for pain of the smartphone group was 6.0 +/- 2.2 and ended up with 1.8 +/- 2.5 after 12 weeks, whereas the self-exercise group showed 5.8 +/- 2.3 for the baseline visual analogue scale for pain and 2.2 +/- 1.7 at the end. Significant time-dependent improvements in all measured values were observed in both groups (all ps < 0.001), but no significant intergroup difference was observed after 4, 8, or 12 weeks of treatment. In the smartphone group, Technology Acceptance Model-2 and Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use scores showed high patient satisfaction with smartphone-assisted exercise. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between home-based exercise using a smartphone application and a conventional self-exercise program for the treatment of frozen shoulder in terms of visual analogue scale for pain and range of motions.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help