Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Kinesio Taping reduces pain and improves disability in low back pain patients: a randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| de Brito Macedo L, Richards J, Borges DT, Melo SA, Brasileiro JS |
| Physiotherapy 2019 Mar;105(1):65-75 |
| clinical trial |
| 8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Kinesio Taping (KT) on chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis. SETTING: University laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eight women with chronic non-specific LBP underwent an evaluation pre, 3 and 10 days after intervention. INTERVENTIONS: After randomisation, participants were assigned to four groups: KT with tension group (KTT) applied KT with tension in the region of the erector spinae muscles; KT no tension group (KTNT) applied KT with no tension in the same region; Micropore group (MP) applied Micropore tape on the erector spinae muscles; and control group (CG) did not receive any intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was pain sensation, measured by numerical pain rating scale. Secondary outcomes were: disability (Roland Morris Disability questionnaire), trunk range of motion (inclinometry), strength (dynamometry) and electromyographic amplitude (electromyography). RESULTS: Improved pain relief was observed for KTT group (mean difference 2.0; 95% CI 0.5 to 3.4; p = 0.003) and KTNT group (mean difference (MD) 1.9; 95% CI 0.5 to 3.4; p = 0.004) compared with CG at 3 days after application of the tape. For disability, there was a difference between CG and KTT group at 3 days (MD 3.5; 95% CI 0.8 to 6.1; p = 0.004) and 10days (MD 32; 95% CI 0.4 to 6.0; p = 0.016). For all the other variables, there were no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: KT with or without tension reduces pain 3days after its application. Additionally, when applied with tension, it improves disability after 3 and 10 days in patients with LBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02550457.
|