Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of inspiratory muscle training versus usual care before surgery for oesophageal cancer
Valkenet K, Trappenburg JCA, Ruurda JP, Guinan EM, Reynolds JV, Nafteux P, Fontaine M, Rodrigo HE, van der Peet DL, Hania SW, Sosef MN, Willms J, Rosman C, Pieters H, Scheepers JJG, Faber T, Kouwenhoven EA, Tinselboer M, Rasanen J, Ryynanen H, Gosselink R, van Hillegersberg R, Backx FJG
The British Journal of Surgery 2018 Apr;105(5):502-511
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of patients undergoing oesophagectomy develop pneumonia. The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) reduces the rate of pneumonia after oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients with oesophageal cancer were randomized to a home-based IMT programme before surgery or usual care. IMT included the use of a flow-resistive inspiratory loading device, and patients were instructed to train twice a day at high intensity (more than 60% of maximum inspiratory muscle strength) for 2 weeks or longer until surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative pneumonia; secondary outcomes were inspiratory muscle function, lung function, postoperative complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay and physical functioning. RESULTS: Postoperative pneumonia was diagnosed in 47 (39.2%) of 120 patients in the IMT group and in 43 (35.5%) of 121 patients in the control group (relative risk 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.53; p = 0.561). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the groups. Mean (SD) maximal inspiratory muscle strength increased from 76.2 (26.4) to 89.0 (29.4) cmH2O (p < 0.001) in the intervention group and from 74.0 (30.2) to 80.0 (30.1) cmH2O in the control group (p < 0.001). Preoperative inspiratory muscle endurance increased from 4 min 14 s to 7 min 17 s in the intervention group (p < 0.001) and from 4 min 20 s to 5 min 5 s in the control group (p = 0.007). The increases were highest in the intervention group (p < 0.050). CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in preoperative inspiratory muscle function, home-based preoperative IMT did not lead to a decreased rate of pneumonia after oesophagectomy. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01893008 (https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help