Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Falls after hospital discharge: a randomized clinical trial of individualized multi-modal falls prevention education
Hill AM, McPhail SM, Haines TP, Morris ME, Etherton-Beer C, Shorr R, Flicker L, Bulsara M, Waldron N, Lee DA, Francis-Coad J, Boudville A
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2019 Sep;74(9):1511-1517
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Older people are at high risk of falls after hospital discharge. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of providing individualized falls prevention education in addition to usual care on falls rates in older people after hospital discharge compared to providing a social intervention in addition to usual care. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial at three hospitals in Western Australia: participants followed for six months after discharge. Baseline and outcomes measured by assessors masked to group allocation. PARTICIPANTS: Aged 60 years and over, admitted for rehabilitation. Eligibility included: cognitively able to undertake education (Abbreviated mental test score > 7/10). INTERVENTION: Tailored education comprising patient video and workbook, structured discussion and goal setting led by trained therapist. MAIN OUTCOMES: Falls in the six months after discharge; proportion of participants sustaining one or more falls. RESULTS: There were 382 (194 intervention; 188 control) participants (mean age 77.7 (SD 8.7) years). There were 378 falls (fall rate/1,000 patient days, 5.9 intervention; 5.9 control) reported by 164 (42.9%) participants in the six months following hospital discharge; 188 (49.7%) of these falls were injurious. There were no significant differences in falls rates between intervention and control groups: (adjusted IRR 1.09; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.52)) or the proportion of participants who fell once or more (adjusted OR 1.37; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.07). CONCLUSIONS: Providing individualized falls prevention education prior to discharge did not reduce falls at home after discharge. Further research is warranted to investigate how to reduce falls during this high risk transition period.
Copyright the Gerontological Society of America. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help