Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Treadmill training and kinesiotherapy versus conventional physiotherapy in Parkinson's disease: a pragmatic study
da Silva Rocha Paz T, Guimaraes F, Santos de Britto VL, Correa CL
Fisioterapia em Movimento [Physical Therapy in Movement] 2019;32:e003201
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

INTRODUCTION: Physiotherapy has been identified in the literature as an important treatment for individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) to improve functional capacity. Little is discussed about the physiotherapy practice environment for this population. OBJECTIVE: To assess pragmatically the effects of two physiotherapy protocols: conventional physiotherapy (CP) and treadmill training and kinesiotherapy (TTK) in PD patients. METHOD: Twenty-four PD patients classified from 1 to 3 on the Hoehn and Yahr scale were randomly distributed into two groups. In CP group (12 patients), exercises aimed to improve range of motion, bradykinesia, postural adjustments and gait. In TTK group (12 patients), exercises aimed to improve physical fitness, mobility and functional independence. The treatments were performed for 50 minutes, twice a week for 14 weeks. The following evaluations were performed before and after the interventions: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS); gait speed (GS); up stairs (US) and down stairs (DS) tests; timed get-up-and-go test (TUG) and 6-Minute Walk Distance Test (6-MWDT). Sociodemographic and clinical data were presented as descriptive analysis. Variables with normal and non-normal distributions were analyzed by specific statistical tests. RESULTS: Intragroup analysis showed significant results for the TTK group (TUG, US, DS, GS, UPDRS total and UPDRS II) and for the CP group only UPDRS total. Intergroup analysis was favorable for the TTK group (TUG, US, DS, 6-MWDT). CONCLUSION: CP group improved the patients' general clinical status, while treadmill and kinesiotherapy improved the physical-functional and clinical aspects.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help