Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison
Momenzadeh OR, Pourmokhtari M, Sefidbakht S, Vosoughi AR
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2015 Dec;16(4):317-321
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: The position of immobilization after anterior shoulder dislocation has been a controversial topic over the past decade. We compared the effect of post-reduction immobilization, whether external rotation or internal rotation, on coaptation of the torn labrum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients aged < 40 years with primary anterior shoulder dislocation without associated fractures were randomized to post-reduction external rotation immobilization (nine patients) or internal rotation (11 patients). After 3 weeks, magnetic resonance arthrography was performed. Displacement, separation, and opening angle parameters were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Separation (1.16 +/- 1.11 versus 2.43 +/- 1.17 mm), displacement (1.73 +/- 1.64 versus 2.28 +/- 1.36 mm), and opening angle (15.00 +/- 15.84 versus 27.86 +/- 14.74 degrees) in the externally rotated group were decreased in comparison to the internally rotated group. A statistically significant difference between groups was seen only for separation (p = 0.028); p values of displacement and opening angle were 0.354 and 0.099, respectively. CONCLUSION: External rotation immobilization after reduction of primary anterior shoulder dislocation could result in a decrease in anterior capsule detachment and labral reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help