Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison |
| Momenzadeh OR, Pourmokhtari M, Sefidbakht S, Vosoughi AR |
| Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2015 Dec;16(4):317-321 |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: No; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
BACKGROUND: The position of immobilization after anterior shoulder dislocation has been a controversial topic over the past decade. We compared the effect of post-reduction immobilization, whether external rotation or internal rotation, on coaptation of the torn labrum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients aged < 40 years with primary anterior shoulder dislocation without associated fractures were randomized to post-reduction external rotation immobilization (nine patients) or internal rotation (11 patients). After 3 weeks, magnetic resonance arthrography was performed. Displacement, separation, and opening angle parameters were assessed and analyzed. RESULTS: Separation (1.16 +/- 1.11 versus 2.43 +/- 1.17 mm), displacement (1.73 +/- 1.64 versus 2.28 +/- 1.36 mm), and opening angle (15.00 +/- 15.84 versus 27.86 +/- 14.74 degrees) in the externally rotated group were decreased in comparison to the internally rotated group. A statistically significant difference between groups was seen only for separation (p = 0.028); p values of displacement and opening angle were 0.354 and 0.099, respectively. CONCLUSION: External rotation immobilization after reduction of primary anterior shoulder dislocation could result in a decrease in anterior capsule detachment and labral reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.
|