Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Intervention for childhood obesity based on parents only or parents and child compared with follow-up alone |
| Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Wolf Linhard D, Nagelberg N, Poraz I, Shalitin S, Phillip M, Meyerovitch J |
| Pediatric Obesity 2018 Nov;13(11):647-655 |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVES: The study aims to assess the effects of family-based interventions targeted to parents only or to parents-and-child for the prevention and treatment of childhood obesity. METHOD: An open-label randomized study was conducted in 247 children (166 girls, 5 to 11 years) with body mass index (BMI) in the 85 to 98th percentile. Participants were allocated to three groups: parents-only (n = 89), parents-and-child (n = 84) and follow-up alone (n = 74). The intervention consisted of 12 once-weekly meetings with a dietician and psychologist. All children were followed for 2 years. Changes in anthropometric, clinical and lifestyle outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The 3-month intervention was completed by 58 (65.2%) in the parents-only, 61 (72.6%) in the parents-child and 49 (66.2%) in the control group (p = 0.554). BMI-standard deviation score (SDS) decreased from baseline to 3 months in both intervention groups (parents-only from 1.74 +/- 0.31 to 1.66 +/- 0.36, p < 0.001; parents-child 1.83 +/- 0.33 to 1.76 +/- 0.36, p = 0.012), with no significant change in the controls (1.73 +/- 0.32 to 1.70 +/- 0.31, p = 0.301). The 2-year follow-up was completed by 45 in each of the intervention groups (50.5% and 53.5%, respectively) and 37 controls (50%) (p = 0.896). Compared with baseline, only the parents-child group showed a significant decrease in BMI-SDS (1.56 +/- 0.46, p = 0.006). The rate of children who met the criteria for metabolic syndrome tended to drop from 6.0% at baseline (14/232) to 1.5% at 3 months (12/137) (p = 0.109), with no significant between-group differences in the rate of metabolic syndrome at baseline or at completion of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention programme that focuses on both parents and children was found to have positive short-term and long-term effects on BMI-SDS.
|