Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparision of low and high volume of resistance training on body fat and blood biomarkers in untrained older women: a randomized clinical trial [with consumer summary]
Cunha PM, Tomeleri CM, Nascimento MA, Mayhew JL, Fungari E, Trindade L, Barbosa DS, Venturini D, Cyrino ES
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2021 Jan;35(1):1-8
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of resistance training (RT) performed with 2 different volumes on body fat and blood biomarkers in untrained older women. Sixty-five physically independent older women (>= 60 years) were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: low-volume (LV) training group, high-volume (HV) training group, and a control group. Both training groups performed RT for 12 weeks, using 8 exercises of 10 to 15 repetitions maximum for each exercise. The low-volume group performed only a single set per exercise, whereas the HV group performed 3 sets. Anthropometric, body fat (%), trunk fat, triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very LDL-c (VLDL-c), glucose (GLU), c-reactive protein (CRP), and composite z-score were measured. The HV group obtained greater improvements compared with the LV group (p < 0.05) for TG (LV -10.5% versus HV -16.6%), VLDL-c (LV -6.5% versus HV -14.8%), GLU (LV -4.7% versus HV -11.1%), CRP (LV -13.2% versus HV -30.8%), % body fat (LV -2.4% versus HV -6.1%), and composite z-score (LV -0.13 +/- 0.30 versus HV -0.57 +/- 0.29). Trunk fat was reduced (p < 0.05) only in the HV group (-6.8%). We conclude that RT performed in higher volume seems to be the most appropriate strategy to reduce body fat (%), trunk fat, improve blood biomarkers, and reduce composite z-score in older women.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help