Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Acute and chronic effects of foam rolling versus eccentric exercise on ROM and force output of the plantar flexors |
| Aune AAG, Bishop C, Turner AN, Papadopoulos K, Budd S, Richardson M, Maloney SJ |
| Journal of Sports Sciences 2019;37(2):138-145 |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
Foam rolling and eccentric exercise interventions have been demonstrated to improve range of motion (ROM). However, these two modalities have not been directly compared. Twenty-three academy soccer players (age 18 +/- 1; height 1.74 +/- 0.08 m; body mass 69.3 +/- 7.5 kg) were randomly allocated to either a foam rolling (FR) or eccentric exercise intervention designed to improve dorsiflexion ROM. Participants performed the intervention daily for a duration of four weeks. Measurements of dorsiflexion ROM, isometric plantar flexion torque and drop jump reactive strength index were taken at baseline (pre-intervention) and at three subsequent time-points (30-min post, 24-hours post and 4-weeks post). A significant time x group interaction effect was observed for dorsiflexion (p = 0.036), but not for torque or reactive strength index. For dorsiflexion, there was a significant increase in both acute (30-min; p < 0.001) and chronic (4-week; p < 0.001) ROM for the eccentric group, whilst FR exhibited only an acute improvement (p < 0.001). Eccentric training would appear a more efficacious modality than foam rolling for improving dorsiflexion ROM in elite academy soccer players.
|