Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
|Does pectoralis minor stretching provide additional benefit over an exercise program in participants with subacromial pain syndrome? A randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]|
|Gutierrez-Espinoza H, Araya-Quintanilla F, Gutierrez-Monclus R, Rios-Riquelme M, Alvarez-Bueno C, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Cavero-Redondo I|
|Musculoskeletal Science & Practice 2019 Aug;44:102052|
|8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*|
BACKGROUND: Adaptive shortening of the pectoralis minor is one of the biomechanical mechanisms associated with subacromial pain syndrome (SPS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of an exercise program alone with an exercise program in combination with pectoralis minor stretching in participants with SPS. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Eighty adult participants with SPS were randomly allocated to two groups. The control group (n = 40) received a 12-week specific exercise program and the intervention group (n = 40) received the same program plus stretching exercises of the pectoralis minor muscle. The primary outcome measure was shoulder function assessed by a Constant-Murley questionnaire, and the secondary outcomes were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS), and pectoralis minor resting length. RESULTS: The present study shows no difference between the two interventions according to the Constant-Murley questionnaire (1.5 points; p = 0.58), VAS at rest (0.2 cm; p = 0.11), VAS at movement (0.5 cm; p = 0.08), and pectoralis minor resting length (0.3 cm; p = 0.06). The DASH questionnaire showed greater functional improvement in the control group (5.4 points; p = 0.02). Finally, only pectoralis minor length index showed difference statistical significant in favor of intervention group (0.3%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In the short-term, the addition of a program of stretching exercises of the pectoralis minor does not provide significant clinical benefit with respect to functional improvement or pain reduction in participants with SPS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN number U1111-1210-3555. Registered 5 March 2018.