Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effects of interval walking training compared to normal walking training on cognitive function and arterial function in older adults: a randomized controlled trial |
| Okamoto T, Hashimoto Y, Kobayashi R |
| Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2019 Oct;31(10):1451-1459 |
| clinical trial |
| 5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
PURPOSE: This study investigated whether interval walking training (IWT) improves cognitive function and arterial function in older adults. METHODS: A total of 68 older adults registered in clinical trials (mean age +/- standard deviation, 70 +/- 4 years) were randomly assigned to two groups: one group performed IWT (n = 34), and the other performed normal walking training (NWT, n = 34). Participants in the IWT group performed five or more sets of low-intensity walking (duration: 3 min per set; peak aerobic capacity for walking: 40%) followed by high-intensity walking (duration: 3 min per set; peak aerobic capacity for walking: > 70%). The NWT group walked at approximately 50% of the peak aerobic capacity for walking. The IWT and NWT were performed for 20 weeks. Trail making test-A and B and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were measured in both groups at baseline and again at the end of the 20-week study period. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, time for trail making test-A (IWT group: p = 0.00004, NWT group: p = 0.000006) and B (IWT group: p = 0.03, NWT group: p = 0.003) as well as cfPWV (IWT group: p = 0.000002, NWT group: p = 0.03) decreased significantly after the 20-week study period in both groups. However, cfPWV in the IWT group decreased significantly more than that in the NWT group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These results suggested that although both IWT and NWT were similarly effective at improving cognitive function, IWT reduced central arterial stiffness more than NWT.
|