Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Feasibility and effect of a physical activity counselling session with or without provision of an activity tracker on maintenance of physical activity in women with breast cancer -- a randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Singh B, Spence RR, Sandler CX, Tanner J, Hayes SC
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2020 Mar;23(3):283-290
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: The SAFE-Maintain study sought to evaluate the effect and acceptability of a physical activity counselling (PAC) session, versus a PAC session plus provision of a Fitbit (Charge HR; PAC+F), on maintenance of physical activity levels 12 weeks following participation in a supervised exercise intervention. DESIGN: Fifty-two women with stage II plus breast cancer who had recently (within the previous 7 days) completed a 12-week supervised exercise program were randomised to the PAC or PAC+F group. METHODS: Physical activity levels, including weekly minutes of total physical activity (min/week), daily step count (steps/day), and weekly minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA, min/week), were assessed using the Active Australia survey and Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers. Self-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline and 12-week follow-up, while objectively-measured outcomes were only available at 12-week follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with the PAC group, the PAC+F group had higher self-reported MVPA and self-reported total activity (between-group mean difference 78.2 (95% CI -8.3 to 164.9) min/week, p < 0.01, and 171.9 (95% CI 46.1 to 297.8) min/week, p < 0.01, respectively) at 12-week follow-up. Higher objectively-assessed MVPA (p = 0.03) and steps/day (p = 0.07) at 12-week follow-up was also observed in the PAC+F group compared with the PAC group. Most (> 80%) of the PAC+F group reported high levels of Fitbit use and considered the device to be beneficial for physical activity maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that activity trackers show promise as an effective, feasible and acceptable approach to support physical activity maintenance following completion of a supervised exercise intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR, trial registration number ACTRN12616000954426).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help