Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of mobile health prompts on self-monitoring and exercise behaviors following a diabetes prevention program: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial
MacPherson MM, Merry KJ, Locke SR, Jung ME
JMIR MHealth and UHealth 2019 Sep;7(9):e12956
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: A number of mobile health (mHealth) apps exist that focus specifically on promoting exercise behavior. To increase user engagement, prompts, such as text messages, emails, or push notifications, are often used. To date, little research has been done to understand whether, and for how long, these prompts influence exercise behavior. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of prompts on mHealth self-monitoring and self-reported exercise in the days following a prompt and whether these effects differ based on exercise modality. METHODS: Of the possible 99 adults at risk for developing type II diabetes who participated in a diabetes prevention program, 69 were included in this secondary analysis. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 2 exercise conditions: high-intensity interval training or moderate-intensity continuous training. In the year following a brief, community-based diabetes prevention program involving counseling and supervised exercise sessions, all participants self-monitored their daily exercise behaviors on an mHealth app in which they were sent personalized prompts at varying frequencies. mHealth self-monitoring and self-reported exercise data from the app were averaged over 1, 3, 5, and 7 days preceding and following a prompt and subsequently compared using t tests. RESULTS: In the year following the diabetes prevention program, self-monitoring (t[68] = 6.82; p < 0.001; d = 0.46) and self-reported exercise (t[68] = 2.16; p = 0.03; d = 0.38) significantly increased in the 3 days following a prompt compared with the 3 days preceding. Prompts were most effective in the first half of the year, and there were no differences in self-monitoring or self-reported exercise behaviors between exercise modalities (p values > 0.05). In the first half of the year, self-monitoring was significant in the 3 days following a prompt (t[68] = 8.61; p < 0.001; d = 0.60), and self-reported exercise was significant in the 3 days (t[68] = 3.7; p < 0.001; d = 0.37), 5 days (t[67] = 2.15; p = 0.04; d = 0.14), and 7 days (t[68] = 2.46; p = 0.02; d = 0.15) following a prompt, whereas no significant changes were found in the second half of the year. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence regarding the potential influence of prompts on mHealth self-monitoring and self-reported exercise and the duration for which prompts may be effective as exercise behavior change tools. Future studies should determine the optimal prompting frequency for influencing self-reported exercise behaviors. Optimizing prompt frequency can potentially reduce intervention costs and promote user engagement. Furthermore, it can encourage consumers to self-monitor using mHealth technology while ensuring prompts are sent when necessary and effective. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): derr2-10.2196/11226.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help