Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Calling out MS fatigue: feasibility and preliminary effects of a pilot randomized telephone-delivered exercise intervention for multiple sclerosis fatigue |
Kratz AL, Atalla M, Whibley D, Myles A, Thurston T, Fritz NE |
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 2020 Jan;44(1):23-31 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fatigue is a common and debilitating symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Exercise therapy is effective in reducing MS-related fatigue; however, its feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness when delivered over the telephone remain unknown. This randomized study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a telephone-delivered exercise intervention for MS-related fatigue. In addition, pre-/postchange in fatigue and secondary outcomes were compared with an otherwise identical in-person delivered exercise intervention. METHODS: Twenty participants with MS and clinically significant fatigue were randomized to 8 sessions of either telephone (n = 10) or in-person (n = 10) delivered exercise therapy. Primary outcome measures concerned feasibility (number of sessions attended), acceptability (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), and fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale and two 11-point numeric rating scales: fatigue intensity and interference). Data on a range of secondary outcome measures were also collected. RESULTS: There was no difference in average session attendance by group (telephone group: 7.6 +/- 1.3 sessions; in-person 7.8 +/- 0.42). Acceptability and reductions in fatigue were observed regardless of group, and improvements in a range of secondary outcomes were comparable. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A telephone-delivered exercise intervention that targets MS-related fatigue is both feasible and acceptable. Primary and secondary outcome measures signaled that telephone-delivered exercise may be an effective mode of delivery that overcomes barriers to care in persons with MS and warrants testing in larger efficacy trials.
|