Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Acute ventilatory support during whole-body hybrid rowing in patients with high-level spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled cross-over trial |
Vivodtzev I, Picard G, Cepeda FX, Taylor JA |
Chest 2020 May;157(5):1230-1240 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: High-level spinal cord injury (SCI) results in profound spinal and supraspinal deficits, leading to substantial ventilatory limitation during whole-body hybrid functional electrical stimulation (FES)-rowing, a form of exercise that markedly increases the active muscle mass via electrically-induced leg contractions. We tested the effect of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) on ventilatory and aerobic capacities during in SCI. METHODS: Nineteen patients with SCI (C4 to T8) were enrolled in a blinded randomized cross-over study. All patients were familiar with FES-rowing and had plateaued in their training-related increases in aerobic capacity. Patients performed 2 FES-rowing peak exercise tests with NIV or sham. RESULTS: NIV increased exercise tidal volume (peak 1.50 +/- 0.31 versus 1.36 +/- 0.34 L, p < 0.05) and reduced breathing frequency (peak 35 +/- 7 versus 38 +/- 6 bpm, p < 0.05) compared to sham, leading to no change in alveolar ventilation (VA) but a trend to increased oxygen uptake efficiency (p = 0.06). In those who reached VO2peak criteria (n = 13), NIV failed to significantly increase VO2peak (1.73 +/- 0.66 versus 1.78 +/- 0.59 L/min); however, the range of responses revealed a correlation between changes in VApeak and VO2peak (r = 0.89, p < 0.05). Furthermore, those with higher level injuries and shorter time since injury demonstrated the greatest increases in VO2peak. CONCLUSION: Acute NIV can successfully improve ventilatory efficiency during FES exercise in SCI but may not improve VO2peak in all patients. Those who benefit most appear to be patients with cervical SCI within a shorter time since injury.
|