Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of thermotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial [with consumer summary]
Machado AFP, Perracini MR, Rampazo EP, Driusso P, Liebano RE
Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2019 Dec;47:102188
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of thermotherapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (PPT) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (PD). DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Physiotherapy Department of the Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo (Brazil). INTERVENTIONS: Eighty-eight dysmenorrheic women were randomly allocated into four groups: thermotherapy+TENS (n = 22), thermotherapy (n = 22), TENS (n = 22) and placebo (n = 22). Thermotherapy was applied by microwave diathermy (20 min), and TENS (200 mus, 100 Hz, 30 min), into the lower abdomen both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity was measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (Br-MPQ). PPT and CPM were recorded from women's abdominal and lumbar. The evaluation was done in 5 times: baseline, after 20, 50, 110 min and 24 h from intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the NRS for thermotherapy+TENS versus TENS, for thermotherapy versus TENS and for placebo, after 20 min; for thermotherapy versus TENS and for placebo, after 110 min and 24 h. Abdomen PPT increased in the thermotherapy+TENS versus TENS and placebo, after 50 min; for thermotherapy+TENS versus placebo and for thermotherapy versus placebo, after 110 min. No changes in lumbar PPT and CPM were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of thermotherapy reduced NRS compared to the TENS and placebo after 20, 110 min and 24 h. Thermotherapy demonstrated an increase in the PPT in the abdomen after 50 and 110 min and decreased the Br-MPQ scores after 110 min in patients with PD.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help