Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Ventilatory support or respiratory muscle training as adjuncts to exercise in obese CPAP-treated patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Vivodtzev I, Tamisier R, Croteau M, Borel JC, Grangier A, Wuyam B, Levy P, Minville C, Series F, Maltais F, Pepin JL
Thorax 2018 Jul;73(7):634-643
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and obesity are interdependent chronic diseases sharing reduced exercise tolerance and high cardiovascular risk. Intervention A 3-month intervention with innovative training modalities would further improve functional capacity and cardiovascular health than usual cycle exercise training in already continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-treated obese patients with OSA. METHODS: Fifty three patients (35 < body mass index (8BM1) < 45 kg/m2) were randomly allocated to exercise training on a cycle ergometer, either alone (ERGO) or with respiratory muscle training (ERGO+RMT) or non-invasive ventilation (ERGO+NIV). Changes in 6 min walking distance (primary outcome), aerobic capacity (VO2peak) cardiovascular parameters, body composition and sleep quality were evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All training modalities increased 6 min walking distance without differences between groups (p = 0.97). ERGO+NIV and ERGO+RMT led to significantly higher improvement in VO2peak compared with ERGO (3.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 4.6) versus 2.3 (0.8 to 3.7) versus 0.5 (-1.0 to 1.9) mL/min/kg, respectively, p = 0.04) and ERGO+NIV significantly reduced self-measured blood pressure compared with ERGO+RMT and ERGO (systolic -9.5 (95% CI -14.1 to -4.9) versus -13 (-5.8 to 3.1) versus -0.7 (-5.1 to 3.8) mmHg, respectively, p = 0.01). Waist and neck circumferences were reduced after ERGO+NIV compared with ERGO+RMT and ERGO (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combining RMT or NIV with cycling exercise training failed to provide further improvement in functional capacity as compared with cycling exercise training alone. However, the combination of NIV and exercise training demonstrated superiority for improving cardiometabolic risk factors in obese CPAP-treated patients with OAS.
Reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help