Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effects of intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxia on mobility and perceived health in geriatric patients performing a multimodal training intervention: a randomized controlled trial
Bayer U, Likar R, Pinter G, Stettner H, Demschar S, Trummer B, Neuwersch S, Glazachev O, Burtscher M
BMC Geriatrics 2019 Jun 14;19(167):Epub
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Additional benefits of passive exposures to intermittent hypoxia and hyperoxia on cognitive performance and functional exercise capacity have been demonstrated in geriatric patients who performed a multimodal training program. The main goal of the present study was to evaluate effects of adding intermittent hypoxic-hyperoxic training (IHHT) to a multimodal training intervention (MTI) on mobility and perceived health in old individuals at a geriatric day hospital. METHODS: Thirty-four patients between 64 and 92 years participated in the double blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial. The elderly patients attended in a 5 to 7 weeks lasting MTI (strength, endurance, balance, reaction, flexibility, coordination, and cognitive exercises) and performed IHHT (breathing 10 to 14% oxygen for 4 to 7 min followed by 2 to 4 min 30 to 40% oxygen) in the hypoxic group (HG) or placebo treatment with ambient air in the normoxic group (NG) in parallel. Before and after all treatments, mobility was assessed by the Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT), the Timed-Up-and-Go Test (TUG) and Barthel-Index, while perceived health was assessed by one part of the EQ-5D Test, the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). RESULTS: After the MTI+IHHT or normoxia sessions, results of the TMT, TUG, Barthel Index and EQ-VAS revealed no significant difference between HG and NG (+14.9% versus +15.4%, p = 0.25; -21% versus -26.3%, p = 0.51; +4.2% versus +3.6%, p = 0.56; +37.9% versus +33.9%, p = 0.24;). CONCLUSIONS: IHHT added to MTI did not elicit additional improvements in perceived health and mobility compared to MTI alone.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help