OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) and high intensity interval training (HIIT) on adult lipid profiles; to identify training or participant characteristics that may determine exercise-induced change in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TRG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: English language searches of several databases were conducted from inception until September 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR EXCLUDING STUDIES: Inclusion: (1) published randomised controlled human trials with group population n >= 5; (2) intervention duration >= 4 weeks; (3) comparing HIIT with MICT; and (4) reporting pre-post intervention lipid measurements. Exclusion: subjects with chronic disease, < 18 years, pregnant/lactating, in elite athletic training; and studies with a dietary or pharmaceutical intervention component. RESULTS: Twenty-nine data sets (mmol/L) of 823 participants were pooled and analysed. Neither HIIT nor MICT was better in decreasing TC (0.10 (-0.06 to 0.19), p = 0.12, I2 = 0%), TRG (-0.05 (-0.11 to 0.01), p = 0.10, I2 = 0%), LDL-C (0.05 (-0.06 to 0.17), p = 0.37, I2 = 0%), or TC/HDL-C (-0.03 (-0.36 to 0.29), p = 0.85, I2 = 0%). HIIT significantly raised HDL-C (0.07 (0.04 to 0.11), p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) compared with MICT. CONCLUSION: Neither HIIT nor MICT is superior for altering TC, TRG, or LDL-C, or TC-HDL-C ratio. Compared with MICT, HIIT appeared to significantly improve HDL-C. Clinicians may prescribe either protocol to encourage participation in exercise and reduce cardiovascular risk. To raise HDL-C, HIIT may result in a larger effect size compared with MICT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019136722.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• PubMed Central
• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher