Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Auto-servoventilation in heart failure with sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled trial
Arzt M, Schroll S, Series F, Lewis K, Benjamin A, Escourrou P, Luigart R, Kehl V, Pfeifer M
The European Respiratory Journal 2013 Nov;42(5):1244-1254
clinical trial
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

We tested the hypotheses that in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and sleep disordered breathing (SDB) auto-servoventilation (ASV) improves cardiac function and quality of life. Between March 2007 and September 2009, patients with stable CHF (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <= 40%) and SDB (apnoea/hypopnoea index >= 20 events/h were randomised to receive either ASV (BiPAP ASV (Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA, USA), n = 37) and optimal medical management, or optimal medical management alone (n = 35). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 12 weeks. The apnoea/hypopnoea index assessed with polysomnography scored in one core laboratory was significantly more reduced in the ASV group (-39 +/- 16 versus -1 +/- 13 events/h; p < 0.001) with an average use of 4.5 +/- 3.0 h/day. Both groups showed similar improvements of the primary end-point LVEF (+3.4 +/- 5 versus +3.5 +/- 6%; p = 0.915) assessed with echocardiography. In the ASV group, reduction of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was significantly greater (-360 +/- 569 versus +135 +/- 625 ng/mL; p = 0.010). No differences were observed between the groups in subjective quality of life. In patients with CHF and SDB, ASV reduced NT-proBNP levels, but improvement of LVEF or quality of life was not greater than in the control group. The data support that such patients can be randomised in large-scale, long-term trials of positive airway pressure therapy versus control to determine effects on cardiovascular outcome.
Permission granted by European Respiratory Society Journals Ltd.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help