CONTEXT: Interval cycle training could positively influence dynamic balance in middle-aged women. OBJECTIVE(S): To compare training effects of a strength ergometer and a standard ergometer on 3 dynamic balance tests. DESIGN(S): Repeated measures. SETTING(S): Laboratory. PARTICIPANT(S): Seventeen women were randomly assigned to standard (n = 10) or strength cycle ergometry (n = 7). A control group consisted of 7 women. INTERVENTION(S): Ergometry interval training (3 sessions/wk for 4 wk). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Three balance tests-the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), timed up-and-go (TUG), and four-square step test (FSST)-were performed at pre- training and 4 wk posttraining. RESULT(S): Four SEBT directions improved and faster scores for FSST and TUG tests for the standard-cycle group were found, whereas the strength-cycle group only improved their TUG scores. No changes posttraining for the control group. CONCLUSION(S): Stationary cycle training should be included in the dynamic balance- rehabilitation protocol for middle-aged women.
Copyright Human Kinetics. Reprinted with permission from Human Kinetics (Champaign, IL).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help

• DOI
• PubMed
• PDF locator
• publisher