Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Rehabilitation in warm climate for young adults with inflammatiory arthritis: a 12-month randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Nilssen IR, Koksvik HS, Gronning K, Steinsbekk A |
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2020 Apr;52(4):jrm00040 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if an intensive rehabilitation programme, including intensive exercise and patient education, for young adults with inflammatory arthritis, conducted in a warm climate, has long-term effects on general health status compared with usual care. DESIGN: Open randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS: A total of 64 patients with inflammatory arthritis, aged 20 to 35 years. METHODS: Patients underwent randomized allocation to an intensive 17-day rehabilitation programme in a warm climate (intervention group) or to usual care with no structured rehabilitation (control group). The primary outcomes were physical function, assessed by the "30-second Sit to Stand test"(30sSTS), and coping, measured by the "Effective Musculoskeletal Consumer Scale" (EC17). RESULTS: A total of 64 patients (mean age 27.5 years, 62.5% female) were randomized. Thirty out of 32 patients completed the intervention. At 12-month follow-up, 7 patients were lost to follow-up; 4 from the intervention group and 3 from the control group. The intervention group showed significant improvement in the physical function test at 3 months; estimated mean difference (95% confidence interval): 5.5 (2.8 to 8.1), 6 months 3.6 (0.4 to 6.8) and 12 months 4.0 (0.0 to 7.9), compared with the control group. There were no differences in coping between the 2 groups at 3, 6 or 12 months. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation in a warm climate improves physical functioning, but not coping, in young adults with RA.
|