Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Haptic versus sensorimotor training in the treatment of upper limb dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a multi-center, randomised controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Solaro C, Cattaneo D, Basteris A, Carpinella I, de Luca A, Mueller M, Bertoni R, Ferrarin M, Sanguineti V |
| Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2020 Feb;412:116743 |
| clinical trial |
| 6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: No; Blind subjects: Yes; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
BACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis (MS) exercise improves upper limb functions, but it is unclear what training types are more effective. OBJECTIVE: This study compares robot-assisted training based on haptic or sensorimotor exercise. METHODS: 41 clinically definite MS subjects with upper limb impairment were randomised into two groups: (i) haptic and (ii) sensorimotor. Subjects in the haptic performed a robot-assisted training protocol designed to counteract incoordination and weakness. The task -interaction with a virtual mass-spring system against a resistive load- requires coordination skills. Task difficulty and magnitude of resistive load were automatically adjusted to the individual impairment. Subjects in the sensorimotor performed reaching movements under visual control; the robot generated no forces. Both groups underwent eight training sessions (40 min/session, 2 sessions/week). Treatment outcome were 9HPT and ARAT scores. RESULTS: The average 9HPT score decreased from 74 +/- 9 s to 61 +/- 8 s for the haptic and from 49 +/- 6 s to 44 +/ -6 s. We found a significant treatment (p = 0.0453) and time differences (p = 0.005), but no significant treatment x time interactions although we found that the absolute change was only significant in the haptic group (p = 0.011). We observed no significant changes in the ARAT score. Participants tolerated treatments well with a low drop-out rate. In the subjects evaluated at after 12 week (11 subject in sensory-motor and 17 in haptic group) no retention of the effect was found. CONCLUSIONS: Task oriented training may improve upper limb function in persons with MS especially in prevalent pyramidal impaired subjects without maintain the effects after three months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02711566 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
|