Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Efficacy of prone lumbar traction on chronic discogenic low back pain and disability |
| Beyki M, Abedi M, Soleimani F, Mousavi ME, Roghani RS |
| Iranian Rehabilitation Journal 2007 Sep;5(1):20-23 |
| clinical trial |
| 4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: No. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of prone and supine lumbar traction in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized control trial. SETTING: Urban physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 124 subjects with chronic low back pain (LBP) and evidence of a degenerative and/or herniated inter-vertebral disk at 1 or more levels of the lumbar spine, who have not our exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: A 4-week course of lumbar traction, prone or supine in case and control groups consecutively, consisting of six 30-minute sessions every other days, followed by four 30-minute sessions every 3 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The numeric visual pain rating scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were completed at pre-intervention and discharge (within 2 weeks of the last visit). RESULTS: A total of 124 subjects completed the treatment protocol. We noted significant improvements for all post-intervention outcome scores when compared with pre-intervention scores (p < 0.01). Also found significant difference between 2 groups in favor of prone traction (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Traction applied in the prone position for 4 weeks was associated with improvements in pain intensity and ODI scores at discharge, in a sample of patients with activity limiting LBP. However, because we lacked a reasonable long time follow-up, we cannot imply a long lasting relationship between the traction and outcome, and a long time follow-up is suggested.
|