Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Comparison of the efficacy of dry needling and high-power pain threshold ultrasound therapy with clinical status and sonoelastography in myofascial pain syndrome
Aridici R, Yetisgin A, Boyaci A, Tutoglu A, Bozdogan E, Sen Dokumaci D, Kilicaslan N, Boyaci N
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2016 Oct;95(10):e149-e158
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of high-power pain threshold (HPPT) ultrasound therapy applied to the trigger points and dry needling (DN) in myofascial pain syndrome. DESIGN: Sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to an HPPT (n = 30) and dry needling (n = 31) groups. The primary outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), both at 1 week and 4 weeks after treatment. The secondary outcome measures were the number of painful trigger points, range of the tragus-acromioclavicular joint, the Short Form-36, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and sonoelastographic tests after a 1-week treatment. RESULTS: More improvement was seen in anxiety in the HPPT group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups with regard to other parameters (p > 0.05). A decrease in tissue stiffness was only seen in the HPPT group (p < 0.05). Significant posttreatment improvements were seen on all clinical scales in both groups (p < 0.05). After a treatment period of 4 weeks, a significant improvement was also observed on the visual analog scale and NPDS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study favors the efficacy of both treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome. Although a significant decrease was shown in tissue stiffness with HPPT, neither of these treatments had an apparent superiority.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help