Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Treatment of neck pain with myofascial therapies: a single blind randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Rodriguez-Huguet M, Rodriguez-Almagro D, Rodriguez-Huguet P, Martin-Valero R, Lomas-Vega R |
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 2020 Feb;43(2):160-170 |
clinical trial |
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of myofascial release therapy versus a standard physical therapy program in patients with neck pain (NP). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial in which 54 participants with mechanical NP were randomly assigned into an experimental group (EG) or a comparison group (CG). The EG group (n = 27) received 5 therapy sessions of myofascial release therapy while the CG group (n = 27) received 10 sessions of massage, ultrasound therapy, and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation over a 2-week period. Outcome measures were the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and range of motion at the end of treatment and at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 1-month follow-up, between-group differences in change scores were found in the NPRS (mean -1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.30 to -0.81; p < 0.001), in the right thoracic PPT (mean 0.35, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66; p = 0.031), and in both left (mean 0.34, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.61; p = 0.012) and right (mean 0.29, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.54; p = 0.026) suboccipital PPTs. The success rate was 63.0% in the CG and 92.6% in the EG. The number needed to treat was 3.38 (95% CI 1.99 to 11.23). CONCLUSIONS: Myofascial release therapy could be better than a standard physical therapy program for improving pain and suboccipital PPTs in patients with NP. However, the difference between both treatments is less than the minimum detectable change of the NPRS.
|