Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effectiveness of spinal manipulation and myofascial release compared with spinal manipulation alone on health-related outcomes in individuals with non-specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Boff TA, Pasinato F, Ben AJ, Bosmans JE, van Tulder M, Carregaro RL |
Physiotherapy 2020 Nov;107:71-80 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of spinal manipulation combined with myofascial release compared with spinal manipulation alone, in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with three months follow-up. SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two individuals (between 18 and 50 years of age; CNLBP >= 12 consecutive weeks) were enrolled and randomly allocated to one of two groups: (1) Spinal manipulation and myofascial release -- SMMRG; n = 36) or (2) Spinal manipulation alone (SMG; n = 36). INTERVENTIONS: Combined spinal manipulation (characterized by high velocity/low amplitude thrusts) of the sacroiliac and lumbar spine and myofascial release of lumbar and sacroiliac muscles versus manipulation of the sacroiliac and lumbar spine alone, twice a week, for three weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments were performed at baseline, three weeks post intervention and three months follow-up. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, pressure pain-threshold and dynamic balance. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between SMMRG versus SMG in pain intensity and disability post intervention and at follow-up. We found an overall significant difference between-groups for CNLBP disability (SMG-SMMRG: mean difference of 5.0; 95% confidence interval of difference 9.9 to -0.1), though this effect was not clinically important and was not sustained at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that spinal manipulation combined with myofascial release was not more effective compared to spinal manipulation alone for patients with CNLBP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03113292.
|