Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effectiveness of spinal manipulation and myofascial release compared with spinal manipulation alone on health-related outcomes in individuals with non-specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
| Boff TA, Pasinato F, Ben AJ, Bosmans JE, van Tulder M, Carregaro RL |
| Physiotherapy 2020 Nov;107:71-80 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of spinal manipulation combined with myofascial release compared with spinal manipulation alone, in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with three months follow-up. SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two individuals (between 18 and 50 years of age; CNLBP >= 12 consecutive weeks) were enrolled and randomly allocated to one of two groups: (1) Spinal manipulation and myofascial release -- SMMRG; n = 36) or (2) Spinal manipulation alone (SMG; n = 36). INTERVENTIONS: Combined spinal manipulation (characterized by high velocity/low amplitude thrusts) of the sacroiliac and lumbar spine and myofascial release of lumbar and sacroiliac muscles versus manipulation of the sacroiliac and lumbar spine alone, twice a week, for three weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments were performed at baseline, three weeks post intervention and three months follow-up. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, pressure pain-threshold and dynamic balance. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between SMMRG versus SMG in pain intensity and disability post intervention and at follow-up. We found an overall significant difference between-groups for CNLBP disability (SMG-SMMRG: mean difference of 5.0; 95% confidence interval of difference 9.9 to -0.1), though this effect was not clinically important and was not sustained at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that spinal manipulation combined with myofascial release was not more effective compared to spinal manipulation alone for patients with CNLBP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03113292.
|