Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Randomised control trial of humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus standard oxygen in the emergency department [with consumer summary] |
| Bell N, Hutchinson CL, Green TC, Rogan E, Bein KJ, Dinh MM |
| Emergency Medicine Australasia 2015 Dec;27(6):537-541 |
| clinical trial |
| 7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
Copyright release for this abstract has not been granted.
|