Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on improving care for patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a randomized controlled trial
Li Z, Chen Q, Yan J, Liang W, Wong WCW
BMC Health Services Research 2020 Jan 23;20(57):Epub
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: To assess the effects of a motivational interviewing (MI)-based patient empowerment program (PEP) on type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patient self-management compared to traditional diabetes health education. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-five patients, recruited from community health centers (CHCs) and the family medicine clinic in the University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital in Shenzhen, were randomly assigned to the intervention or control groups. Patients in the intervention group (n = 117) received a four-session PEP in small groups over 1 month by trained nurses and doctors. The control group (n = 108) received the traditional lecture-style health education on DM. All the patients were followed up for 3 months. Outcomes included problem areas in diabetes (PAID) that measures diabetes-related emotional distress, patient enablement index (PEI), mental health, patient satisfaction respectively as well as lifestyle behaviors were assessed at baseline, post-activity and 3 months. RESULTS: At post-intervention and the 3-month follow-up, the PAID score improved significantly in the intervention group (12.7 +/- 13.6, 5.8 +/- 7.6) compared to the control group (22.7 +/- 22.8, 11.7 +/- 14.6). No difference was found between groups for changes to exercise, diet, and medication adherence. The PEI score improved significantly at the 3-month follow-up in the MI group (7.27 +/- 2.45 versus 5.81 +/- 2.97). CONCLUSION: The PEP has a significant effect on improving diabetes-related distress, but MI was not significantly different from the traditional health education programs when it comes to the readiness to change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04120844 ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of registration October 9th 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help