Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Participation in physical activity during center and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with COPD: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Lahham A, McDonald CF, Mahal A, Lee AL, Hill CJ, Burge AT, Cox NS, Moore R, Nicolson C, O'Halloran P, Gillies R, Holland AE
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2019 Mar;39(2):E1-E4
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: To compare levels of physical activity during center and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive participants (23 male, n = 20, in the home-based group) with mean age of 68 +/- 8 yr and forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) 53 +/- 18% predicted undertook physical activity monitoring using the SenseWear Armband during the final week of the interventions of center or home-based PR. Differences in time spent in total physical activity (>= 1.5 METs), time spent in moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (>= 3 METs), and steps were compared. RESULTS: Home participants spent a median and interquartile range of 310 (199 to 328) min/d engaged in total physical activity (29% moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity) compared with 300 (204 to 370) min/d for the center group (28% moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity, p = 0.98). Daily step count did not differ between groups (home-based median 5232 (2067 to 7718) versus center-based median 4049 (1983 to 6040), p = 0.66). Of note, center-based participants took 38% more steps on days of program attendance compared with nonattendance days (mean difference 761 steps/d; 95% CI -56 to 1579, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: For people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undertaking PR, no differences in physical activity levels between center and home-based programs were demonstrated. Understanding the impact of the indirect supervision and motivational interviewing technique utilized during home-based PR on levels of physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may support clinical implementation of the model as an alternative option to traditional care.
For more information on this journal, please visit http://www.lww.com.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help