Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

The effects of a nurse-led lifestyle intervention program on cardiovascular risk, self-efficacy and health promoting behaviours among patients with metabolic syndrome: randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Zheng X, Yu H, Qiu X, Chair SY, Wong EM-L, Wang Q
International Journal of Nursing Studies 2020 Sep;109:103638
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of cardio-metabolic risk factors and a major burden for public health due to its increasing prevalence and adverse effects on cardiovascular health. Lifestyle modification is the first-line intervention for metabolic syndrome management. However, adopting healthy behaviours is challenging among patients with metabolic syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a nurse-led lifestyle intervention program on cardiovascular risks, self-efficacy and the implementation of health promoting behaviours. DESIGN: A two-armed randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 173 patients that satisfied the metabolic syndrome definition of International Diabetes Federation was recruited from a hospital in North China. METHODS: The participants were randomly assigned to either attend the lifestyle interventions (n = 86) or receive usual care from the study hospital (n = 87). The lifestyle intervention followed the framework of Health Promotion Model and consisted of one face-to-face education session (30 to 40 min), one educational booklet and six telephone follow-ups (bi-weekly, 20 to 30 min per call) in three months. The Framingham 10-year risk score was calculated to measure the participants' cardiovascular risks at baseline and 3-month. The Self-rated Abilities for Health Practices and Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II was employed to measure the self-efficacy and health promoting behaviours at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month. The generalized estimating equation model was employed to examine the effects of the lifestyle intervention program. RESULTS: No difference was detected in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Decreased cardiovascular risk was found in the lifestyle intervention group, but no significant group-by-time effect was detected. The self-efficacy for nutrition, stress dimension and sum score of health promoting behaviours revealed significant improvements at 1-month (all p < 0.05). Significant improvements were also detected in all subscales, total scale of self-efficacy, all dimensions and the sum score of health promoting behaviours at 3-month (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nurse-led Health Promotion Model guided lifestyle intervention program effectively improved the self-efficacy and implementation of health promoting behaviours in patients with metabolic syndrome. We recommend that nurses apply lifestyle interventions in routine care for patients with metabolic syndrome.
With permission from Excerpta Medica Inc.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help