Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Acupuncture of different treatment frequencies in knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomised controlled trial
Lin L-L, Tu J-F, Wang L-Q, Yang J-W, Shi G-X, Li J-L, Zhang N, Shao J-K, Zou X, Liu C-Z
Pain 2020 Nov;161(11):2532-2538
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

This 16-week randomised controlled trial (8-week treatment followed by 8-week follow-up) evaluated the symptomatic improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis on 3 sessions per week of acupuncture (TSWA) compared to 1 session per week of acupuncture (OSWA). Sixty participants were randomised to either the TSWA or the OSWA group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as the percentage of participants achieving >= 2 points decrease on the numerical rating scale (NRS) and >= 6 points decrease in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score at week 8 compared with baseline. Additional outcomes included response rates at weeks 4 and 16, NRS, WOMAC, Patient Global Assessment, 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and treatment credibility and expectancy. No significant difference was seen in response rate between TSWA and OSWA groups at week 8 (64.7% versus 50.0%; difference 14.7 percentage points (95% CI -10.1 to 39.4 percentage points), p = 0.435). At weeks 4 and 16, the TSWA group had higher response rates than the OSWA group (week-4 difference 44.7 percentage points (95% CI 23.2 to 66.1 percentage points), p = 0.001; week-16 difference 46.0 percentage points (95% CI 24.4 to 67.6 percentage points), p < 0.001). Participants in the TSWA group experienced significantly greater improvements in NRS, WOMAC function, and Patient Global Assessment than those in the OSWA group. There were no significant between-group differences in WOMAC stiffness and SF-12. In summary, TSWA immediately improved knee pain and dysfunction compared with OSWA. In addition, the benefit of TSWA persists throughout follow-up.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help