Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Acupuncture of different treatment frequencies in knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomised controlled trial |
Lin L-L, Tu J-F, Wang L-Q, Yang J-W, Shi G-X, Li J-L, Zhang N, Shao J-K, Zou X, Liu C-Z |
Pain 2020 Nov;161(11):2532-2538 |
clinical trial |
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
This 16-week randomised controlled trial (8-week treatment followed by 8-week follow-up) evaluated the symptomatic improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis on 3 sessions per week of acupuncture (TSWA) compared to 1 session per week of acupuncture (OSWA). Sixty participants were randomised to either the TSWA or the OSWA group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as the percentage of participants achieving >= 2 points decrease on the numerical rating scale (NRS) and >= 6 points decrease in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function score at week 8 compared with baseline. Additional outcomes included response rates at weeks 4 and 16, NRS, WOMAC, Patient Global Assessment, 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and treatment credibility and expectancy. No significant difference was seen in response rate between TSWA and OSWA groups at week 8 (64.7% versus 50.0%; difference 14.7 percentage points (95% CI -10.1 to 39.4 percentage points), p = 0.435). At weeks 4 and 16, the TSWA group had higher response rates than the OSWA group (week-4 difference 44.7 percentage points (95% CI 23.2 to 66.1 percentage points), p = 0.001; week-16 difference 46.0 percentage points (95% CI 24.4 to 67.6 percentage points), p < 0.001). Participants in the TSWA group experienced significantly greater improvements in NRS, WOMAC function, and Patient Global Assessment than those in the OSWA group. There were no significant between-group differences in WOMAC stiffness and SF-12. In summary, TSWA immediately improved knee pain and dysfunction compared with OSWA. In addition, the benefit of TSWA persists throughout follow-up.
|