Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Baseline characteristics did not identify people with low back pain who respond best to a movement system impairment-based classification treatment [with consumer summary]
Azevedo DC, Ferreira PH, de Oliveira Santos H, Oliveira DR, de Souza JVL, Oliveira Pena Costa L
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2020 Jul-Aug;24(4):358-364
clinical trial
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Treatment based on the movement system impairment-based classification for chronic low back pain results in the same benefit when compared to other forms of exercise. It is possible that participant's characteristics measured at baseline can identify people with chronic low back pain who would respond best to a treatment based on the movement system impairment model. OBJECTIVES: To assess if specific characteristics of people with chronic low back pain measured at baseline can modify the effects of a treatment based on the movement system impairment model on pain and disability. METHODS: Four variables assessed at baseline that could potentially modify the treatment effects of the treatment based on the movement system impairment model were selected (age, educational status, physical activity status and STarT back tool classification). Separate univariate models were used to investigate a possible modifier treatment effect of baseline participant's characteristics on pain and disability after the treatment. Findings of interaction values above 1 point for the outcome mean pain intensity or above 3 points for disability (Roland Morris questionnaire) were considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses for the outcomes of pain and disability did not show interaction values considered clinically relevant for age, educational status, physical activity status and STarT back tool classification. CONCLUSION: Age, educational status, physical activity status and STarT back tool classification did not modify the effects of an 8-week treatment based on the movement system impairment model in patients with chronic low back pain. Registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02221609 (https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02221609).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help