Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Evaluating an intervention program using WeChat for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized controlled trial |
Jiang Y, Liu F, Guo J, Sun P, Chen Z, Li J, Cai L, Zhao H, Gao P, Ding Z, Wu X |
Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020 Apr;22(4):e17089 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: The application of telemedicine in home pulmonary rehabilitation interventions for the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has achieved promising results. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a WeChat official account (pulmonary internet explorer rehabilitation (PeR)) based on social media. It further evaluated the effect of PeR on the quality of life, symptoms, and exercise self-efficacy of patients with COPD. METHODS: The functional modules of PeR were developed by a multidisciplinary team according to the electronic health-enhanced chronic care model (eCCM) components. A total of 106 patients were randomly selected (53 in the PeR group and 53 in the outpatient face-to-face group (FtF)). Pulmonary rehabilitation intervention was conducted for 3 months, and the outcome was observed for 3 months. The primary outcome was patient quality of life measured with the COPD assessment test (CAT). The secondary outcomes were evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC), exercise self-regulatory efficacy scale (Ex-SRES), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis was used in the study. A total of 94 participants completed the 6-month pulmonary rehabilitation program. No statistically significant differences were observed in CAT (F[1,3] = 7.78, p = 0.001), Ex-SRES (F[1,3] = 21.91, p < 0.001), and mMRC scores (F[1,3] = 29.64, p < 0.001) between the two groups with the variation in time tendency. The Ex-SRES score had a significant effect on the CAT score (p = 0.03). The partial regression coefficient of Ex-SRES to CAT was 0.81, and Exp (B) was 2.24. CONCLUSIONS: The telemedicine technology was effective using the eCCM combined with a behavioral intervention strategy centering on self-efficacy. Pulmonary rehabilitation at home through PeR and FtF could improve the sense of self-efficacy and quality of life and alleviate symptoms in patients with COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1900022770; https://tinyurl.com/tmmvpq3.
|