Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effectiveness of video-based rehabilitation program on pain, functionality, and quality of life in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Turkmen E, Analay Akbaba Y, Altun S
Journal of Hand Therapy 2020 Jul-Sep;33(3):288-295
clinical trial
7/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

BACKGROUND: Video-based rehabilitation programs, which are also used in the treatment of neurological disorders, could be a beneficial treatment option for patients who cannot receive treatment. PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of video-based rehabilitation program in the conservative treatment of partial rotator cuff tears in comparison to a physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation program. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Thirty-three voluntary patients with partial rotator cuff tear were randomized into two groups: video-based rehabilitation (VBR) group and physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation (PSR) group, for a common 6 weeks rehabilitation program. After drop outs, thirty participants (mean +/- SD age 50.60 +/- 8.54 years; 10 female) were finally completed the trial. Active shoulder range of motion, pain, functional status, and health-related quality of life of the patients were assessed before and after treatment. Also, treatment satisfaction level was assessed at the end of the treatment. RESULTS: There was statistically significant improvement in terms of active shoulder range of motion values (mean differences at 95% confidence interval for abduction 30.75 to 51.37 in the VBR group, 34.20 to 54.45 in the PSR group, p = 0.001 in both groups) and secondary outcome measures within both groups (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of all outcome measures between groups (p > 0.05). The level of satisfaction from treatment in the PSR group was higher than that in the VBR group. CONCLUSION: A video-based rehabilitation program is an effective option in terms of shoulder range of motion, pain, functionality, and quality of life and has a comparable success level with a PSR program in the conservative treatment of partial rotator cuff tears.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help