Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Mechanical efficiency improvement in relation to metabolic changes in sedentary obese adults [with consumer summary]
Jabbour G, Iancu HD
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine 2015;1(1):e000044
clinical trial
4/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: Mechanical efficiency (ME) refers to the ability of an individual to transfer energy consumed by external work. This performance indicator is impaired by obesity and is associated with decreased high-intensity exercise performance. However, it is unclear if ME may be improved in response to high intensity training (HIT). This study aimed to determine if ME increases in response to HIT in obese adults and to identify the factors associated with these changes. METHODS: 24 obese adults (body mass index approximately 33 kg/m2) were randomised into control (n = 12) and trained (n = 12) groups. Following baseline metabolic, anthropometric, fitness and ME measurements, the participants completed a 6-week exercise intervention that included 18 sessions of six repeats of 6 s supramaximal sprints on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer. The metabolic, anthropometric and fitness assessments were repeated postintervention. ME (expressed as a %) was calculated during an incremental maximal cycling test at stages of 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 W. RESULTS: ME did not differ across the groups at 25 and 50 W. Following HIT, ME increased significantly at 75, 100 and 125 W (p < 0.01, respectively) compared with the control group (p < 0.01, respectively). Although no changes in fat-free mass were observed following HIT, the increases in ME at 75, 100 and 125 W correlated positively with both homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance index decreases (r = 0.9; r = 0.89 and r = 0.88, p < 0.01, respectively) and peak power increases (r = 0.87, r = 0.88 and r = 0.9, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no changes in the participants' anthropometric variables, HIT improved ME in obese adults, an enhancement that appears to be related to increases in muscle strength and metabolic adaptations.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help