Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Effects of an individually targeted multicomponent counseling and home-based rehabilitation program on physical activity and mobility in community-dwelling older people after discharge from hospital: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary] |
Turunen KM, Aaltonen-Maatta L, Tormakangas T, Rantalainen T, Portegijs E, Keikkala S, Kinnunen ML, Finni T, Sipila S, Nikander R |
Clinical Rehabilitation 2020 Apr;34(4):491-503 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of multicomponent rehabilitation on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and mobility in older people recently discharged from hospital. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Home and community. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling people aged 60 years recovering from a lower limb or back musculoskeletal injury, surgery, or disorder were recruited from local health center hospitals and randomly assigned into an intervention (n = 59) or a control (standard care, n = 58) group. INTERVENTION: The six-month intervention consisted of a motivational interview, goal attainment process, guidance for safe walking, a progressive home exercise program, physical activity counseling, and standard care. MEASUREMENTS: Physical activity and sedentary time were assessed using an accelerometer and a single question. Mobility was evaluated with the Short Physical Performance Battery, self-reported use of a walking aid, and ability to negotiate stairs and walk outdoors. Intervention effects were analyzed with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Daily physical activity was 127 +/- 78 minutes/day and 121 +/- 70 at baseline and 167 +/- 81 and 164 +/- 72 at six months in the intervention and control group, respectively; mean difference of 3.4 minutes (95% confidence interval (CI) -20.3 to 27.1). In addition, no significant between-group differences were shown in physical performance. CONCLUSION: The rehabilitation program was not superior to standard care for increasing physical activity or improving physical performance. Mobility-limited older people who had recently returned home from hospital would have needed a longer and more frequently monitored comprehensive geriatric intervention.
|