Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Responders to exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis | 
| Teirlinck CH, Verhagen AP, Reijneveld EAE, Runhaar J, van Middelkoop M, van Ravesteyn LM, Hermsen L, de Groot IB, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA | 
| International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 2020 Oct;17(20):7380 | 
| systematic review | 
| The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology workgroup (OMERACT), together with the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) developed the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. These criteria are used to determine if a patient with osteoarthritis (OA) 'responds' to therapy, meaning experiences a clinically relevant effect of therapy. Recently, more clinical OA trials report on this outcome and most OA trials have data to calculate the number of responders according to these criteria. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on the response to exercise therapy, compared to no or minimal intervention in patients with hip OA using the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. The literature was searched for relevant randomized trials. If a trial fit the inclusion criteria, but number of responders was not reported, the first author was contacted. This way the numbers of responders of 14 trials were collected and a meta-analysis on short term (directly after treatment, 12 trials n = 1,178) and long term (6 to 8 months after treatment, six trials n = 519) outcomes was performed. At short term, the risk difference (RD) was 0.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.22) and number needed to treat (NNT) 7.1 (95% CI 4.5 to 17); at long term RD was 0.14 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.20) and NNT 7.1 (95% CI 5.0 to 14.3). Quality of evidence was moderate for the short term and high for the long term. In conclusion, 14% more hip OA patients responded to exercise therapy than to no therapy.  
 |