Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Improvements in lower-extremity function following a rehabilitation program with patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation in females with patellofemoral pain: a randomized controlled trial
Glaviano NR, Marshall AN, Mangum LC, Hart JM, Hertel J, Russell S, Saliba S
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2020 Nov;29(8):1075-1085
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a challenging condition, with altered kinematics and muscle activity as 2 common impairments. Single applications of patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation (PENS) have improved both kinematics and muscle activity in females with PFP; however, the use of PENS in conjunction with a rehabilitation program has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a 4-week rehabilitation program with PENS on lower-extremity biomechanics and electromyography (EMG) during a single-leg squat (SLS) and a step-down task (SDT) in individuals with PFP. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Laboratory. Patients of Other PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen females with PFP (age 23.3 (4.9) y, mass 66.3 (13.5) kg, height 166.1 (5.9) cm). Intervention: Patients completed a 4-week supervised rehabilitation program with or without PENS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Curve analyses for lower-extremity kinematics and EMG activity (gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, vastus medialis oblique, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, and adductor longus) were constructed by plotting group means and 90% confidence intervals throughout 100% of each task, before and after the rehabilitation program. Mean differences (MDs) and SDs were calculated where statistical differences were identified. RESULTS: No differences at baseline in lower-extremity kinematics or EMG were found between groups. Following rehabilitation, the PENS group had significant reduction in hip adduction between 29% and 47% of the SLS (MD 4.62 degrees (3.85 degrees)) and between 43% and 69% of the SDT (MD 6.55 degrees (0.77 degrees)). Throughout the entire SDT, there was a decrease in trunk flexion in the PENS group (MD 10.91 degrees (1.73 degrees)). A significant decrease in gluteus medius activity was seen during both the SLS (MD 2.77 (3.58)) and SDT (MD 4.36 (5.38)), and gluteus maximus during the SLS (MD 1.49 (1.46)). No differences were seen in the sham group lower-extremity kinematics for either task. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation with PENS improved kinematics in both tasks and decreased EMG activity. This suggests that rehabilitation with PENS may improve muscle function during functional tasks.
Copyright Human Kinetics. Reprinted with permission from Human Kinetics (Champaign, IL).

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help