Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| The effect of ultrasound or phonophoresis as an adjuvant treatment for non-specific neck pain: systematic review of randomised controlled trials [with consumer summary] |
| Dorji K, Graham N, Macedo L, Gravesande J, Goldsmith CH, Gelley G, Rice M, Solomon P |
| Disability and Rehabilitation 2022;22(13):2968-2974 |
| systematic review |
|
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of ultrasound/phonophoresis as an adjuvant to exercise or manual therapy for the improvement of patient-centred outcomes in adults with non-specific neck pain (NSNP). METHODS: Seven electronic databases were systematically searched up to September 2020. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to judge the Quality of Evidence (QoE). RESULTS: Six studies involving 249 participants were included. The QoE was very low GRADE. Phonophoresis with capsaicin plus exercise improved pain at immediate post-treatment (MD -3.30 (-4.05 to -2.55)) but not with diclofenac sodium plus exercise as compared to exercise. Continuous ultrasound (CUS) plus exercise improved pain and pressure pain threshold (PPT) at immediate post-treatment (pain MD -3.42 (-4.08 to -2.7)); PPT MD 0.91 (0.68 to 1.14)) and at intermediate-term as compared to exercise. CUS or high power pain threshold (HPPT) ultrasound plus manual therapy and exercise showed no benefit for pain reduction (MD -0.75 (-2.08 to 0.58)) did not improve function/disability (MD -1.05 (-4.27 to 2.17)) at immediate or short-term as compared to manual therapy and exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Due to high risk of bias, inconsistency, and indirectness the QoE is very low in support of benefit of ultrasound/phonophoresis as an adjuvant treatment for NSNP.
|