Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
| Effect of manual therapy and splint therapy in people with temporomandibular disorders: a preliminary study |
| Espi-Lopez GV, Arnal-Gomez A, del Pino AC, Benavent-Corai J, Serra-Ano P, Ingles M |
| Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020 Aug;9(8):2411 |
| clinical trial |
| 6/10 [Eligibility criteria: No; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
|
BACKGROUND: Isolated manual therapy techniques (MT) have shown beneficial effects in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) but the effect of the combination of such techniques, together with the well-stablished splint therapy (ST) remains to be elucidated. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to ascertain whether a combined program of MT techniques, including intraoral treatment, plus traditional ST improves pain and clinical dysfunction in subjects with TMD. METHODS: A preliminary trial was conducted. 16 participants were assigned to either the MT+ST -- experimental group (EG, n = 8) or the ST alone -- control group (CG, n = 8). Forty-five minute sessions of combined MT techniques were performed, once a week for four weeks. Three evaluations were conducted: baseline, post-treatment, and one-month follow-up. Outcome measures were pain perception, pain pressure threshold (PPT), TMD dysfunction, and perception of change after treatment. RESULTS: EG showed significant reduction on pain, higher PPT, significant improvement of dysfunction and significantly positive perception of change after treatment (p < 0.05 all). Additionally, such positive effects were maintained at follow-up with a high treatment effect (R2 explaining 26.6 to 33.2% of all variables). CONCLUSION: MT+ST showed reduction on perceived pain (3 points decrease), higher PPT (of at least 1.0 kg/cm2), improvement of disability caused by pain (4.4 points decrease), and positive perception of change (EG 50% felt "much improvement"), compared to ST alone.
|