Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Comparison of lateral perturbation-induced step training and hip muscle strengthening exercise on balance and falls in community dwelling older adults: a blinded randomized controlled trial |
Rogers MW, Creath RA, Gray V, Abarro J, McCombe Waller S, Beamer BA, Sorkin JD |
The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2021 Sep;76(9):e194-e202 |
clinical trial |
5/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: No; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: No; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
BACKGROUND: This factorial, assessor-blinded, randomized, and controlled study compared the effects of perturbation-induced step training (lateral waist-pulls), hip muscle strengthening, and their combination, on balance performance, muscle strength, and prospective falls among older adults. METHODS: community-dwelling older adults were randomized to four training groups. Induced-step training (IST, n = 25) involved 43 progressive perturbations. Hip abduction strengthening (HST, n = 25) utilized progressive resistance exercises. Combined training (CMB, n = 25) included IST and HST, and the control performed seated flexibility/relaxation exercises (SFR, n = 27). Training involved 36 sessions over 12-weeks. The primary outcomes were the number of recovery steps and first step length, and maximum hip abduction torque. Fall frequency during 12 months after training was determined. RESULTS: Overall, the number of recovery steps was reduced by 31%, and depended upon the first step type. IST and CMB increased the rate of more stable single lateral steps pre-post training than HST and SFR who used more multiple crossover and sequential steps. The improved rate of lateral steps for CMB exceeded the control (CMB/SFR rate ratio 2.68). First step length was unchanged, and HST alone increased hip torque by 25%. Relative to SFR, the fall rate ratios (falls/person/year) (95% confidence interval) were: CMB 0.26 (0.07 to 0.90), IST 0.44 (0.18 to 1.08), HST 0.30 (0.10 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Balance performance through stepping was best improved by combining perturbation and strength training and not strengthening alone. The interventions reduced future falls by 56% to 74% over the control. Lateral balance perturbation training may enhance traditional programs for fall prevention.
|