Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Short-term effects of the traction-manipulation protocol in dizziness intensity and disability in cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial [with consumer summary]
Carrasco-Uribarren A, Rodriguez-Sanz J, Lopez-de-Celis C, Perez-Guillen S, Tricas-Moreno JM, Cabanillas-Barea S
Disability and Rehabilitation 2022;44(14):3601-3609
clinical trial
8/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: Yes; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: Yes; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed*

PURPOSE: Analyse the short-term effects of traction-manipulation protocol in dizziness and pain intensity and disability, cervical mobility and postural instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled assessor-blind clinical trial. The traction-manipulation protocol was carried out in the intervention group and compared with a control group where the subjects were kept supine. The intervention protocol follows the IFOMPT safety recommendations. Dizziness and pain intensity, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), cervical mobility and balance were measured after 48 h and a one-month follow-up. RESULTS: Forty subjects with cervicogenic dizziness were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Significant differences were found in favour of the intervention protocol group in: dizziness intensity (p < 0.001; d = 1.31), DHI (p < 0.001; d = 0.76) pain intensity (p < 0.007; d = 0.92), upper cervical flexion (p < 0.032; d = 0.30) and extension (p < 0.012; d = 0.80) at 48 h follow up. At one-month follow up there were significant differences in favour of the intervention group in: dizziness intensity (p < 0.001; d = 0.95), DHI (p < 0.001; d = 0.0.92) pain intensity (p < 0.001; d = 1.38) and upper cervical extension (p < 0.005; d = 0.92). Postural instability improved in mediolateral displacement static with eyes closed (p < 0.032; d = 0.79) and in dynamic with eyes open (p = 0.003; d = 0.55) at one-month follow-up in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: The traction-manipulation protocol reduces the dizziness and pain intensity, ameliorates disability and improves upper cervical mobility and postural instability.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help