Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.

Detailed Search Results

Effect of action observation therapy in the rehabilitation of neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review
Ryan D, Fullen B, Rio E, Segurado R, Stokes D, O'Sullivan C
Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation 2021 Mar;3(1):100106
systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of action observation therapy (AOT) in the rehabilitation of neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions. DATA SOURCES: Searches were completed until July 2020 from the electronic databases Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (via OvidSP), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing AOT with standard care were assessed. Musculoskeletal (amputee, orthopedic) and neurologic (dementia, cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, stroke) conditions were included. There were no age limitations. Articles had to be available in English. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full extracts of studies for eligibility and assessed the risk of bias of each study using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data extraction included participant characteristics and intervention duration, frequency, and type. RESULT(S): The effect of AOT in different outcome measures (OMs) was referenced in terms of body structures and functions, activities and participation, and environmental factors as outlined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Of the 3,448 articles identified, 36 articles with 1,405 patients met the inclusion criteria. Seven of the 11 meta-analyses revealed a significant effect of intervention, with results presented using the mean difference and 95% CI. A best evidence synthesis was used across all OMs. Strong evidence supports the use of AOT in the rehabilitation of individuals with stroke and Parkinson disease; moderate evidence supports AOT in the rehabilitation of populations with orthopedic and multiple sclerosis diagnoses. However, moderate evidence is provided for and against the effect of AOT in persons with Parkinson disease and cerebral palsy. CONCLUSION(S): This review suggests that AOT is advantageous in the rehabilitation of certain conditions in improving ICF domains. No conclusions can be drawn regarding treatment parameters because of the heterogeneity of the intervention. AOT has been considerably less explored in musculoskeletal conditions.

Full text (sometimes free) may be available at these link(s):      help