Use the Back button in your browser to see the other results of your search or to select another record.
Acute effects of ventilator hyperinflation with increased inspiratory time on respiratory mechanics: randomized crossover clinical trial |
Chicayban LM |
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 2019 Oct;31(3):289-295 |
clinical trial |
6/10 [Eligibility criteria: Yes; Random allocation: Yes; Concealed allocation: Yes; Baseline comparability: Yes; Blind subjects: No; Blind therapists: No; Blind assessors: No; Adequate follow-up: Yes; Intention-to-treat analysis: No; Between-group comparisons: Yes; Point estimates and variability: Yes. Note: Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score] *This score has been confirmed* |
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ventilator hyperinflation on respiratory mechanics. METHODS: A randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted with 38 mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection. The order of the hyperinflation and control (without changes in the parameters) conditions was randomized. Hyperinflation was performed for 5 minutes in pressure-controlled ventilation mode, with progressive increases of 5 cmH2O until a maximum pressure of 35 cmH2O was reached, maintaining positive end expiratory pressure. After 35 cmH2O was reached, the inspiratory time and respiratory rate were adjusted so that the inspiratory and expiratory flows reached baseline levels. Measurements of static compliance, total resistance and airway resistance, and peak expiratory flow were evaluated before the technique, immediately after the technique and after aspiration. Two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was used with Tukey's post hoc test, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Ventilator hyperinflation increased static compliance, which remained at the same level after aspiration (46.2 +/- 14.8 versus 52.0 +/- 14.9 versus 52.3 +/- 16.0 mL/cmH2O; p < 0.001). There was a transient increase in airway resistance (6.6 +/- 3.6 versus 8.0 +/- 5.5 versus 6.6 +/- 3.5 cmH2O/Ls; p < 0.001) and a transient reduction in peak expiratory flow (32.0 +/- 16.0 versus 29.8 +/- 14.8 versus 32.1 +/- 15.3 Lpm; p < 0.05) immediately after the technique; these values returned to pretechnique levels after tracheal aspiration. There were no changes in the control condition, nor were hemodynamic alterations observed. CONCLUSION: Ventilator hyperinflation promoted increased compliance associated with a transient increase in airway resistance and peak expiratory flow, with reduction after aspiration.
|